Choosing between the original pure-petrol version of the Ford Puma ST and the new mild-hybrid version may seem like a simple decision. The mild-hybrid version offers better fuel efficiency and lower CO2 emissions for just a £10 increase in price. However, there are some trade-offs to consider.
The original pure-petrol version of the Puma ST features a 198bhp 1.5-litre three-cylinder turbo engine that delivers a combined 42.8mpg on the WLTP test cycle and emits 149g/km of CO2. It also has a respectable 0-62mph sprint time of 6.7 seconds. In comparison, the mild-hybrid version uses a smaller 1.0-litre turbo triple engine as its main powerplant, paired with an integrated 48V starter-generator. This system collects and deploys electrical energy during acceleration and deceleration. While the mild-hybrid version offers slightly improved fuel economy and lower emissions, the gains are modest. Its combined figure is 44.8mpg, an increase of less than 5%, and its CO2 output declines by less than 3%. Additionally, the mild-hybrid version delivers 168bhp, 15% less than the pure-petrol version, and is 0.7 seconds slower from 0-62mph.
Despite these trade-offs, there are some advantages to choosing the mild-hybrid version. One notable advantage is that it comes with a seven-speed automatic gearbox, eliminating the need to shift gears manually. This is particularly appealing for those who prefer a self-shifting hot hatchback. Additionally, the Puma ST Hybrid does not come with the usual automatic margin cost, which can be up to £1500 in other models.
Another benefit of the mild-hybrid version is its impressive throttle response at very low speeds. It excels in delicate maneuvering in traffic, responding keenly to light accelerator inputs. The short-term intervention of the integrated starter-generator contributes to this responsiveness. However, it is worth noting that the 1.0-litre engine can produce a low-speed grumble, reminiscent of a distant coffee-grinder.
Overall, the mild-hybrid powertrain fits well within the Puma ST’s envelope. It retains the car’s neat-looking, well-equipped, and reasonably compact crossover design. The chassis offers a tautness, firm ride, and quick-geared steering system that is precise and fairly heavy. It may take some time to acclimate to the chassis if you haven’t driven a sporty Ford in a while. However, once you start driving the Puma ST briskly and decisively, its true capabilities shine through. It is a B-roads specialist, offering an enjoyable driving experience on twisty roads.
In conclusion, choosing between the original pure-petrol version and the new mild-hybrid version of the Ford Puma ST requires careful consideration. While the mild-hybrid version offers better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, it comes with a slight decrease in power and acceleration. However, for those who prioritize a self-shifting hot hatchback and want to avoid the additional cost of an automatic gearbox, the mild-hybrid version is an attractive option. Ultimately, both versions of the Puma ST offer a practical and enjoyable driving experience.
