The Evolution of the Dodge Charger: A Visual Comparison

New Generation of the Charger

With the upcoming release of the new generation of the Charger, Dodge is aiming to achieve two goals. The two-door coupe will succeed the Challenger, while the four-door sedan, set to launch next year, will replace the current Charger, offering both traditional ICE and modern EV variants. While specific details about the new model are scarce, we can still conduct a visual comparison with its predecessor.

Design Changes

The latest Challenger and Charger models depart from the distinctive styling of their predecessors. Both the two-door and four-door Chargers share many body panels, including the roof and floor. As confirmed by Stellantis’ design chief, they also share the same length at 206.6 inches.

Exterior Styling

The front and rear ends of the new Chargers are nearly identical, with a similar profile. The new design opts for a retro-futuristic look over a modern aesthetic, a departure from the outgoing model.

Front-End Design

The front end of the new Charger is inspired by the 1969 Dodge Charger, featuring hidden headlights and an elongated grille leading to hood vents. Modern elements like full-width LEDs and sleek surfacing give it a contemporary touch.

Rear Design

Both models feature full-width LED taillights and bumper vents, but the new generation has a more angular design compared to its predecessor. The absence of tailpipes signifies its EV nature, with a twin-turbo inline-six engine planned for the ICE version.

Interior Upgrades

The interior of the new Charger mirrors that of its two-door counterpart, offering modern design and technology. The dashboard of the older model looks outdated in comparison, with smaller displays and analog instruments.

Conclusion

This visual comparison highlights the evolution of the Dodge Charger. Stay tuned for more updates on the new four-door muscle car as Dodge prepares for its launch in 2025. Which design do you prefer: the angular and retro-inspired new Charger or the aggressive stance of its predecessor?