Why Lap Times Shouldn’t Define a Car’s Performance

When it comes to evaluating the performance of a car, lap times have become a popular benchmark. Automakers and enthusiasts alike often turn to the Nürburgring lap time as a measure of a car’s capabilities. However, Porsche GT line boss Andreas Preuninger recently stated that he didn’t know the new Porsche 911 S/T’s Nürburgring lap time, and this is a refreshing perspective.

Preuninger’s point is that lap times aren’t relevant to the ethos of the 911 S/T. This particular model is a road car meant for drivers, with a manual gearbox and a focus on the driving experience rather than outright speed. While it shares its engine with the Porsche 911 GT3 RS, it doesn’t prioritize aerodynamics like its track-focused sibling.

The obsession with lap times can potentially harm the development of sports cars. Some hot hatches, for example, are designed primarily to set a fast lap time at the Nürburgring but end up being sold to customers who may never take them to a track. This emphasis on lap times can lead to compromises in other areas of the car’s performance and overall driving experience.

Another issue with lap times is the lack of consistency between track visits. A recent incident during the Australian Supercars Championship qualifying session highlighted this problem. Drift cars went out to entertain the crowds between qualifying and the one-lap shootout, changing the track surface and reducing grip for the drivers. This resulted in notable inconsistencies in lap times, as later drivers had a cleaner track and were able to go faster.

Now, consider the Nürburgring, where there can be days, weeks, or even months between competing lap times. The track conditions can vary significantly due to factors such as dust, sap, and weather conditions. Volkswagen test driver Benjamin Leuchter once found himself eight seconds slower in a Golf GTI Clubsport at the Nürburgring due to unfavorable conditions. The track can be dusty, greasy, or washed clean depending on recent racing activities and weather patterns.

In contrast, Autocar sets lap times at the Horiba MIRA proving ground during their road tests. While they aim for consistency and repeatability, their approach is more focused on providing a broad measure of performance rather than a one-lap qualifier. The track at Horiba MIRA doesn’t get race rubber, sees regular moderate use, and is free from dust and overhanging trees. However, the owner plans to build a solar farm on half of the track, making lap times even less relevant in the future.

It’s important to remember that lap times are just one aspect of a car’s performance. Factors such as handling, comfort, and everyday usability should also be taken into consideration. A car that excels on the track may not necessarily be the best choice for daily driving or long-distance journeys.

In conclusion, while lap times can be an exciting and competitive aspect of the automotive world, they shouldn’t be the sole determinant of a car’s performance. The Porsche 911 S/T serves as a reminder that driving experience and enjoyment should be prioritized over outright speed. Consistency between track visits and real-world performance should also be considered when evaluating a car’s capabilities. So let’s not judge a car solely by its lap time, but instead appreciate the overall package it offers to drivers.