**Hospital Bans Electric Vehicles Due to Fire Concerns**

The Alder Hey Hospital in Liverpool has temporarily banned electric vehicles (EVs) from one of its car parks while upgrading its sprinkler system. This decision has sparked controversy and raised questions about the safety of EVs compared to traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.

**EV Driver Turned Away**

A UK driver, Paul Freeman-Powell, was recently turned away from the hospital’s car park when he arrived for his son’s appointment. The reason given was that his EV could pose a fire risk due to its battery reacting with the metal structure of the car park.

**Lack of Evidence**

Experts have criticized the hospital’s decision, pointing out that ICE vehicles are actually more prone to fires than EVs. Data shows that gasoline-powered cars are significantly more likely to catch fire than their electric counterparts.

**Public Outcry**

After the incident, Mr. Freeman-Powell took to social media to express his frustration and demand answers from the hospital. He highlighted the misinformation surrounding EV safety and questioned the validity of the ban.

**Hospital’s Response**

Alder Hey Hospital defended its decision, stating that it was advised by the Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service to restrict EV parking during the sprinkler system upgrade. However, EVs are still allowed in the main hospital car park, which offers dedicated charging spaces.

**Expert Opinions**

Experts in the field have refuted the hospital’s claims, citing data that shows EVs are safer than ICE vehicles when it comes to fire risks. The decision to ban EVs from the car park has been criticized as outdated and based on misinformation.

In conclusion, the controversy at Alder Hey Hospital highlights the need for a better understanding of EV technology and its safety features. As EVs become more popular, it is essential for institutions to update their policies and embrace the future of transportation.