Reverse Automatic Emergency Braking Systems: Are They Perfect?

The Imperfection of Reverse Automatic Emergency Braking Systems

Over the years, safety technology has advanced significantly, but it still has a long way to go. Recent tests conducted by AAA have once again highlighted the imperfections of reverse automatic emergency braking systems.

Testing Scenarios

AAA tested the reverse automatic emergency braking systems in four popular crossovers from the 2023 model year. The tests aimed to evaluate the performance of the systems when backing out of a parking space with an obstructed view and encountering a stationary child behind the vehicle.

Results

The results of the tests were less than ideal. In the scenario involving a parked vehicle obstructing the view, the brakes were only automatically applied in 65% of the test runs. Furthermore, the systems only prevented a collision in 2.5% of the test runs.

However, when it came to detecting a stationary child, the systems performed better. The brakes were automatically applied in 75% of the tests, and they successfully prevented a collision 50% of the time.

Technology is Not Infallible

While these results show some improvement in safety, it is important to remember that technology is not infallible. AAA emphasizes that drivers should not solely rely on reverse automatic emergency braking systems but instead use them to enhance their awareness of their surroundings.

AAA also advises drivers to reverse slowly when their view is obstructed, as this gives the sensors more time to detect approaching vehicles. This not only increases safety but also allows other drivers to react.

Conclusion

Reverse automatic emergency braking systems have come a long way, but they are still far from perfect. It is crucial for drivers to remain vigilant and not solely rely on these systems to prevent collisions.

By using reverse automatic emergency braking systems as a tool to enhance awareness, drivers can contribute to safer roads for everyone.

More: AAA Study Finds Driver Assistance Systems Lacking, Particularly Lane Keeping Assist

AAA’s director of automotive engineering, Greg Brannon, emphasizes the need for updated testing requirements for these systems. He suggests considering unusual objects and more realistic scenarios to achieve the greatest safety benefit for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.

Tested Vehicles

The test group consisted of popular crossovers, including the Hyundai Tucson Hybrid, Mazda CX-30, Lexus RX, and Volkswagen Tiguan.