Why Focusing Solely on Electric Vehicles Will Fail, According to Ineos Automotive CEO

In a recent speech at the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders’ (SMMT) Electrified conference, Lynn Calder, the CEO of Ineos Automotive, argued that relying solely on battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) to reach carbon targets is a recipe for failure. Calder emphasized the need for a mix of technologies, including hydrogen and more efficient hybrid combustion engines, to successfully achieve environmental goals.

Calder expressed concern that the current focus on electric vehicles as the only solution could lead to failure and unnecessary expenses. She stated, “If we just say electric vehicles are the way forward for the UK, and that’s all we are going to have, I think there is a risk we are going to fail and a risk that it is going to be expensive.” According to Calder, a comprehensive plan that incorporates various technologies is essential for success.

However, Richard Bruce, the director of transport decarbonization at the Department for Transport, disagreed with Calder’s viewpoint. Bruce argued that promoting multiple fuel options could be used as an excuse for inaction due to its ambiguity within policy. He emphasized the clear advantage of BEVs given the current timescale involved, suggesting that alternative fuels like hydrogen should be utilized in sectors where batteries are less viable, such as aviation.

Carlos Rodrigues, the head of Renault Trucks, supported Bruce’s perspective by asserting that battery-electric vehicles should be the primary choice, especially in the commercial sector. Rodrigues acknowledged that hydrogen is an option but not the ultimate solution. He stated, “Looking at figures such as NOx and its overall impact, BEV is by far the best option, especially when compared to hydrogen.”

Despite the opposing views, Calder stood firm in her belief that different technologies are suitable for different vehicles and use cases. She highlighted the Ineos Grenadier, a vehicle sold with only a 3.0-liter pure-petrol or -diesel engine, as an example. Calder explained that the Grenadier is designed for remote areas, towing heavy loads, and traversing challenging terrains like mountains. In such scenarios, electric vehicles may not be the most practical option due to infrastructure limitations.

Augustín Martín, the UK boss of Toyota, supported Calder’s stance, emphasizing the importance of choice in tackling carbon emissions. He stated, “If carbon is the enemy, it cannot be solved by one technology alone. Choice can never be bad.” Martín also acknowledged that different regions around the world are at different stages of readiness for electric vehicles, suggesting that alternative solutions may be more appropriate in certain countries.

In conclusion, the debate over the exclusive reliance on electric vehicles continues to divide industry experts. While some argue that BEVs are the most viable and effective solution, others, like Lynn Calder of Ineos Automotive, advocate for a mix of technologies to achieve environmental goals. The key lies in finding the right balance between different power sources and considering the specific requirements of each vehicle and use case. As the world moves towards a greener future, it is crucial to remain open to various options and adapt strategies accordingly.